The buffalo bills vs atlanta falcons match player stats reflect a game defined by rushing dominance, turnover control, and situational efficiency. Atlanta generated 443 total yards and avoided giveaways, while Buffalo managed 291 yards but struggled with two costly interceptions. The statistical gap explains the 24–14 final score more clearly than the scoreboard alone.
A closer look at the buffalo bills vs atlanta falcons match player stats shows how individual performances shaped the outcome. Atlanta’s ground game produced explosive yardage, while Buffalo relied on passing touchdowns to stay competitive. When you break down quarterback efficiency, rushing production, and defensive takeaways, the numbers tell a straightforward story of execution versus missed opportunities.
Buffalo Bills vs Atlanta Falcons Match Overview
The game ended with Atlanta defeating Buffalo 24–14, driven by a dominant rushing attack and fewer mistakes.
-
Atlanta controlled the pace with 443 total yards.
-
Buffalo finished with 291 total yards and two turnovers.
-
The difference came down to explosive plays and ball security.
Final Score and Game Summary
The final score was Falcons 24, Bills 14.
-
Atlanta built early momentum with a strong first drive.
-
Buffalo stayed within reach through the third quarter.
-
A long touchdown run and defensive stops sealed the result.
-
Turnovers shifted field position in Atlanta’s favor.
Date, Venue, and Week Details
The matchup took place in Week 6 of the 2025 NFL regular season at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta.
-
Conference cross-match between AFC and NFC teams.
-
Mid-season timing made the result relevant for playoff positioning.
-
Indoor venue reduced weather variables.
Key Game Highlights
The defining highlight was an 81-yard touchdown run by Atlanta’s lead running back.
-
That play flipped momentum immediately.
-
Atlanta’s defense recorded two interceptions.
-
Buffalo scored twice through the air but could not sustain drives.
Complete Team Statistics Comparison
Atlanta outperformed Buffalo in total yards, rushing production, and turnover margin.
-
Total Yards: 443 (ATL) vs 291 (BUF)
-
Turnovers: 0 (ATL) vs 2 (BUF)
-
Rushing dominance was the biggest statistical gap.
Total Yards and Offensive Production
Atlanta generated balanced offensive production with a heavy ground focus.
-
233 passing yards.
-
210 rushing yards.
-
Consistent first-down efficiency.
Buffalo’s offense was more limited:
-
157 passing yards.
-
134 rushing yards.
-
Struggled on extended drives.
Passing vs Rushing Breakdown
Atlanta leaned on the run to control tempo.
-
Over 47% of total yards came from rushing.
-
Play-action passing benefited from run success.
-
Buffalo relied more on structured passing plays.
Turnovers, Penalties, and Time of Possession
Turnovers were the key differentiator.
-
Buffalo threw two interceptions.
-
Atlanta committed zero turnovers.
-
Time of possession slightly favored Atlanta, helping protect the lead.
Buffalo Bills Player Stats Breakdown
Buffalo’s top performers produced in moments but lacked consistency.
-
Two passing touchdowns kept them competitive.
-
Ground game was steady but not explosive.
-
Defensive unit forced pressure but missed takeaways.
Quarterback Performance Analysis
Josh Allen finished with 180 passing yards, 2 touchdowns, and 2 interceptions.
-
Completion efficiency was moderate.
-
Red-zone execution produced scores.
-
Interceptions disrupted momentum.
Rushing Leaders and Ground Game Impact
James Cook led the ground attack with 87 rushing yards.
-
Averaged solid yards per carry.
-
No rushing touchdowns.
-
Limited explosive runs over 20 yards.
Receiving Leaders and Target Distribution
Buffalo distributed targets across multiple receivers.
-
Tight ends were active in scoring situations.
-
Wide receivers contributed moderate yardage.
-
No single receiver surpassed dominant yardage totals.
Defensive Standouts and Key Tackles
Buffalo’s defense created pressure but failed to swing the turnover battle.
-
Recorded sacks on passing downs.
-
Allowed one major explosive run.
-
Red-zone defense allowed limited but critical scores.
Atlanta Falcons Player Stats Breakdown
Atlanta’s offensive leaders produced efficiently and avoided mistakes.
-
Strong rushing performance defined the game.
-
Passing attack capitalized on favorable coverage.
-
Defense executed key takeaways.
Quarterback Passing Efficiency
Michael Penix Jr. threw for 250 yards and one touchdown.
-
Efficient completion rate.
-
Avoided interceptions.
-
Managed the game with structured reads.
Rushing Performance and Big Plays
Bijan Robinson recorded 170 rushing yards and a touchdown.
-
Included an 81-yard scoring run.
-
Averaged strong yards per carry.
-
Forced defensive adjustments.
Top Receivers and Scoring Contributions
Drake London led receivers with 158 yards and a touchdown.
-
Reliable third-down target.
-
Effective in contested catch situations.
-
Contributed to sustained drives.
Defensive Leaders and Game-Changing Plays
Atlanta’s defense intercepted two passes.
-
Disrupted timing routes.
-
Controlled field position after turnovers.
-
Limited explosive passing plays.
Head-to-Head Historical Stats Between Bills and Falcons
Atlanta holds a slight historical edge in the series.
-
Overall series record favors Atlanta.
-
Matchups are typically close in scoring margin.
All-Time Record and Win–Loss Comparison
The Falcons lead the all-time series.
-
Wins: Atlanta 8.
-
Wins: Buffalo 6.
-
Games often decided by one score.
Average Points Per Game in the Rivalry
Both teams average just over 20 points per game in past meetings.
-
Falcons slightly ahead in scoring average.
-
Defensive games are common in this matchup.
Notable Past Matchups
Previous meetings have featured close finishes.
-
Late-game drives determined outcomes.
-
Balanced offensive production in most games.
-
Limited high-scoring shootouts historically.
Key Turning Points in the Match
The longest rushing touchdown of the game shifted momentum decisively.
-
Occurred during a competitive stretch.
-
Expanded Atlanta’s lead.
-
Changed defensive play-calling from Buffalo.
Momentum-Shifting Plays
The 81-yard touchdown run was the clearest swing moment.
-
Immediate scoring impact.
-
Psychological lift for Atlanta.
-
Increased pressure on Buffalo’s offense.
Red Zone Efficiency Comparison
Atlanta converted red-zone trips efficiently.
-
Secured touchdowns instead of field goals.
-
Buffalo converted but had fewer opportunities.
-
Efficiency difference influenced final margin.
Fourth-Down Decisions and Impact
Conservative fourth-down calls maintained field position strategy.
-
No high-risk fourth-down failures.
-
Field control favored Atlanta late.
-
Buffalo avoided aggressive late-game conversions.
Advanced Metrics and Analytical Insights
Advanced metrics highlight efficiency and explosive play rates.
-
Atlanta had stronger yards-per-play efficiency.
-
Turnover margin correlated directly with win probability.
Quarterback Rating and Completion Efficiency
Atlanta’s quarterback posted a higher passer rating.
-
Clean stat line without interceptions.
-
Higher adjusted net yards per attempt.
-
Buffalo’s rating impacted by turnovers.
Yards Per Play and Explosive Play Rate
Atlanta generated more explosive plays.
-
Higher average yards per offensive snap.
-
Multiple plays over 20 yards.
-
Buffalo limited in deep-play production.
Defensive Pressure and Sack Rate
Both defenses created pressure, but outcomes differed.
-
Sacks were recorded on key downs.
-
Atlanta capitalized with takeaways.
-
Buffalo pressure did not convert into turnovers.
Player Performance Comparison: Bills vs Falcons
Atlanta’s core offensive players outperformed Buffalo’s counterparts statistically.
-
Higher rushing yardage.
-
Better turnover discipline.
-
More explosive production.
QB vs QB Statistical Comparison
Atlanta’s quarterback had more passing yards and no interceptions.
-
250 yards vs 180.
-
1 TD vs 2 TDs.
-
Turnover-free performance was decisive.
Running Back Production Comparison
Atlanta’s lead back significantly outgained Buffalo’s.
-
170 rushing yards vs 87.
-
One long touchdown run.
-
Higher yards per carry average.
Wide Receiver Impact Analysis
Atlanta’s top receiver produced a standout performance.
-
158 receiving yards.
-
Key third-down conversions.
-
Buffalo lacked a comparable high-yardage outing.
How This Match Impacts Season Standings
The result influenced mid-season positioning for both teams.
-
Atlanta strengthened conference standing.
-
Buffalo absorbed a setback in overall record.
Updated Team Records
Atlanta improved its win loss record.
-
Gained momentum in NFC standings.
-
Buffalo’s record tightened playoff margins.
Divisional Implications
Conference matchups affect wildcard positioning.
-
NFC implications favored Atlanta.
-
AFC playoff competition intensified for Buffalo.
Playoff Outlook Considerations
Turnover-heavy losses create pressure later in the season.
-
Atlanta’s balanced offense supports postseason viability.
-
Buffalo must improve turnover margin.
-
Head-to-head results matter in tie scenarios.
FAQs
Who had the most impactful performance in the game?
Atlanta’s lead running back delivered the most decisive performance with 170 rushing yards and an 81-yard touchdown run. That single explosive play shifted momentum and widened the scoring gap.
How did the quarterbacks compare statistically?
Atlanta’s quarterback finished with 250 passing yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. Buffalo’s quarterback threw for 180 yards and two touchdowns but also recorded two interceptions, which proved costly.
What were the most important team stats in this matchup?
The turnover margin and total rushing yards were the key differences. Atlanta had zero turnovers and over 200 rushing yards, while Buffalo gave the ball away twice and struggled to match explosive plays.
Where can I find the complete buffalo bills vs atlanta falcons match player stats?
You can find the complete buffalo bills vs atlanta falcons match player stats on official NFL game centers, ESPN box score pages, CBS Sports, and team websites that publish detailed passing, rushing, receiving, and defensive data.
Did red-zone efficiency impact the final result?
Yes. Atlanta converted red-zone opportunities into touchdowns, while Buffalo had fewer effective red-zone drives. That execution difference directly influenced the 10-point margin.
