Bengals vs Dallas Cowboys Match Player Stats

Overview of the Bengals vs Dallas Cowboys Match

The game ended with Cincinnati defeating Dallas 27–20 in a tightly contested regular-season matchup.

• The contest featured strong quarterback play and explosive receiving production.

• Cincinnati generated more total offense, while Dallas showed balance in the run game.

• Turnovers and late-game execution influenced the final outcome.

Game date, venue, and final score

The matchup took place on December 9, 2024, during the NFL regular season, with Cincinnati winning 27–20.

• Hosted under prime-time conditions.

  More Read

  

  Washington Commanders vs Chargers Match Player Stats

  

  Memphis Grizzlies vs Golden State Warriors match player stats

  

  Buffalo Bills vs Atlanta Falcons Match Player Stats

• One-score margin throughout most of the second half.

• Final drive efficiency separated the teams.

Season context and playoff implications

The result strengthened Cincinnati’s position in the AFC playoff race and added pressure to Dallas in the NFC standings.

• Impacted conference seeding scenarios.

• Influenced wildcard positioning.

• Increased importance of remaining divisional games.

Quick snapshot of total team performance

Cincinnati outgained Dallas in total offensive yards and converted more high-leverage plays.

• Bengals total yards: 433

• Cowboys total yards: 322

• Turnovers: Dallas committed two, Cincinnati one

• Passing production favored Cincinnati; rushing favored Dallas

Full Match Box Score Summary

The box score shows Cincinnati’s edge in passing efficiency and red zone execution.

• Strong third-down conversion rate.

• Higher yards per play average.

• Balanced time-of-possession distribution.

Quarter-by-quarter scoring breakdown

Scoring remained competitive until the fourth quarter, where execution became decisive.

• First half: evenly matched scoring drives.

• Third quarter: defensive adjustments limited explosive plays.

• Fourth quarter: Cincinnati capitalized on key opportunities.

Total yards, turnovers, and possession stats

Cincinnati controlled total offensive output, while Dallas leaned on rushing volume.

• Bengals: 433 total yards.

• Cowboys: 322 total yards.

• Turnover margin favored Cincinnati.

• Possession time remained relatively balanced.

Offensive vs defensive efficiency metrics

Efficiency favored Cincinnati due to higher passing success rate and situational execution.

• Better third-down conversion percentage.

• Higher quarterback rating.

• Defensive pressure created one critical turnover.

Cincinnati Bengals Player Stats Breakdown

Cincinnati’s offensive output centered on elite quarterback-receiver chemistry.

• Passing game drove scoring production.

• Limited but efficient rushing attempts.

• Defensive consistency reduced explosive gains.

Quarterback passing performance

Joe Burrow completed 33 of 44 passes for 369 yards, throwing two touchdowns and recording one interception.

• Completion rate above 70%.

• One interception.

• High efficiency in intermediate routes.

• Strong fourth-quarter decision-making.

Rushing leaders and ground game impact

Chase Brown led the ground attack with 58 rushing yards.

• Moderate carry volume.

• Used primarily to maintain balance.

• Limited explosive rushing plays.

Top receivers and target distribution

Ja’Marr Chase recorded 14 receptions for 177 yards and two touchdowns.

• Primary target in red zone.

• High yards after catch.

• Consistent separation on coverage.

Defensive standouts and key tackles/sacks

Cincinnati’s defense generated pressure and limited deep passing attempts.

• Multiple quarterback hits.

• One key interception.

• Effective containment on early downs.

Dallas Cowboys Player Stats Breakdown

Dallas relied on rushing efficiency and selective passing production.

• Ground game generated over 150 yards.

• Passing attack was conservative.

• Defensive unit created one turnover.

Quarterback passing analysis

Cooper Rush completed 16 of 31 passes for 183 yards and two touchdowns.

• Lower completion percentage.

• One interception.

• Limited downfield attempts.

Leading rushers and yards per carry

Rico Dowdle rushed for 131 yards on 18 carries, averaging 7.3 yards per carry, but did not score a touchdown.

• Strong yards-per-carry average.

• Several chunk gains.

• Minimal red zone scoring from rush attempts.

Receiving leaders and touchdown plays

CeeDee Lamb led receivers with 93 yards and one touchdown.

• Primary red zone option.

• Moderate target share.

• Limited yards after catch compared to opponent.

Defensive impact players and turnovers forced

Dallas’ defense forced one turnover and applied situational pressure.

• Generated sacks on passing downs.

• Struggled in extended coverage situations.

• Allowed multiple third-down conversions.

Head-to-Head Statistical Comparison

Cincinnati outperformed Dallas in passing efficiency and total yardage.

• Cowboys led in rushing yardage.

• Bengals led in scoring efficiency.

• Turnovers tilted game flow.

Passing game comparison

Cincinnati held a clear advantage in passing yards and completion rate.

• 369 passing yards vs 183.

• Higher quarterback rating.

• Better red zone passing success.

Rushing performance comparison

Dallas dominated the ground game statistically.

• 156 rushing yards vs 74.

• Higher yards per carry.

• More designed rushing plays.

Red zone efficiency and third-down conversions

Cincinnati converted more red zone trips into touchdowns.

• Higher touchdown percentage inside the 20.

• Better third-down execution.

• Dallas settled for fewer sustained drives.

Turnover differential and impact on outcome

The turnover margin favored Cincinnati by one.

• One interception difference.

• Turnovers occurred in scoring territory.

• Shifted momentum late in the game.

Top Performers of the Match

The game’s standout contributors directly influenced scoring output.

• Offensive dominance through passing.

• Defensive stops in key moments.

Offensive MVP of the game

Joe Burrow earned offensive MVP status due to yardage and touchdown production.

• Nearly 370 passing yards.

• Three touchdown passes.

• High-pressure performance in final quarter.

Defensive standout player

Cincinnati’s secondary unit limited explosive passes and secured a takeaway.

• Critical interception.

• Tight red zone coverage.

• Controlled deep threats.

Special teams contributions

Special teams maintained field position stability.

• Accurate field goals.

• Effective punt coverage.

• No major return breakdowns.

Most impactful play of the matchup

A fourth-quarter touchdown pass shifted momentum decisively.

• Extended drive under pressure.

• Converted key third down.

• Forced Dallas into catch-up mode.

Advanced Metrics and Analytics Insights

Advanced data confirms Cincinnati’s efficiency advantage.

• Higher expected points added.

• Better passing success rate.

• Improved situational conversion metrics.

Quarterback ratings and efficiency scores

Burrow posted a rating above 110; Rush remained below 80.

• Higher adjusted net yards per attempt.

• Better third-down efficiency.

• Fewer negative plays.

Expected points added (EPA) analysis

Cincinnati generated positive EPA on passing downs.

• Consistent first-down gains.

• Reduced stalled drives.

• Efficient scoring sequences.

Yards after catch (YAC) comparison

Cincinnati receivers produced more YAC overall.

• Strong route timing.

• Effective spacing.

• Quick decision-making.

Pressure rate and sack efficiency

Cincinnati limited defensive pressure more effectively.

• Lower sack rate allowed.

• Faster average release time.

• Better offensive line protection consistency.

Key Moments That Influenced Player Stats

Critical plays shaped final statistical outcomes.

• Fourth-quarter execution mattered most.

• Turnovers shifted field position.

Momentum-shifting drives

A late touchdown drive gave Cincinnati control.

• Sustained multi-play sequence.

• Multiple third-down conversions.

• Efficient clock management.

Critical third- and fourth-down plays

Cincinnati converted high-leverage downs.

• Extended scoring drives.

• Reduced defensive rest.

• Increased possession control.

Turnover-driven scoring opportunities

Dallas’ interception led to scoring consequences.

• Shortened field for Cincinnati.

• Direct scoring conversion.

• Psychological shift in game tempo.

Historical Performance Trends Between Bengals and Cowboys

Past matchups show competitive scoring patterns.

• Games typically decided by one possession.

• Balanced offensive production historically.

Previous matchup statistical patterns

Head-to-head meetings often feature strong quarterback play.

• Above-average passing yard totals.

• Moderate rushing splits.

• Defensive turnovers common.

Offensive and defensive averages in past meetings

Both teams average competitive scoring in prior matchups.

• Mid-to-high 20s scoring range.

• Defensive pressure influencing outcomes.

• Turnover margins frequently decisive.

Notable record-breaking performances

Individual receivers have posted high yardage totals in prior meetings.

• 150+ yard receiving games.

• Multiple-touchdown performances.

• High completion rate contests.

What These Player Stats Mean for the Season

The statistics reinforce Cincinnati’s passing identity and Dallas’ rushing strength.

• Clear offensive tendencies.

• Defined strategic direction.

Impact on team standings

The win improved Cincinnati’s conference positioning.

• Strengthened playoff case.

• Improved tiebreaker scenarios.

• Increased late-season control.

Player performance trends moving forward

Burrow and Chase show sustained offensive consistency.

• High target reliability.

• Efficient scoring partnership.

• Stable passing production.

Injury updates affecting future games

Player health will influence future output stability.

• Monitor offensive line durability.

• Track defensive rotation depth.

• Evaluate workload management for key starters.

Where to Find Official Bengals vs Dallas Cowboys Match Player Stats

Official sources provide verified statistical data.

• Always cross-check for accuracy.

• Use league-certified platforms.

Official NFL box score sources

The NFL’s official game center publishes full box scores.

• Play-by-play breakdown.

• Advanced analytics.

• Verified player stats.

Team websites and verified stat databases

Both franchises maintain detailed statistical archives.

• Individual player breakdowns.

• Weekly performance summaries.

• Injury and roster updates.

Live stat tracking platforms

Real-time platforms provide in-game and post-game data.

• Updated drive charts.

• Efficiency metrics.

• Situational performance indicators.