Washington Commanders vs Chargers Match Player Stats

The Washington Commanders vs Chargers match player stats reveal how each team performed across all aspects of the game, from offensive production to defensive efficiency. By examining individual player contributions and team-level statistics, fans and analysts can gain a clear understanding of which athletes impacted the outcome the most. The detailed numbers highlight standout performances, turnovers, and critical plays that ultimately determined the winner.

In this matchup, Washington demonstrated balanced offensive execution and strong defensive pressure, while the Chargers faced challenges converting key opportunities. The Washington Commanders vs Chargers match player stats also illustrate trends that can affect season standings, playoff positioning, and team strategy moving forward. Analyzing these statistics allows a deeper insight into both teams’ strengths and weaknesses during the game.

Overview of the Washington Commanders vs Chargers Match

The game ended with Washington defeating Los Angeles 27–10 after overcoming an early deficit.

• Washington scored 27 unanswered points.

• Los Angeles led 10–0 before momentum shifted.

• Defensive takeaways and red zone stops changed control of the game.

This matchup reflected a balance of offensive production and defensive efficiency, with Washington capitalizing on critical mistakes.

Final Score and Game Summary

The final score was 27–10 in favor of Washington.

• First quarter: Chargers built an early 10-point lead.

• Second and third quarters: Washington controlled tempo and field position.

• Fourth quarter: Defensive plays secured the outcome.

The turning point came when Washington’s defense created short-field opportunities.

Date, Venue, and Season Context

The game was played during the regular season at SoFi Stadium.

• Mid-season matchup with playoff implications.

• Both teams entered with competitive division records.

• Road performance was a key test for Washington.

The result had direct impact on conference standings and team momentum.

Key Moments That Defined the Game

The defining moments were defensive stops and explosive rushing plays.

• Goal-line interception halted a Chargers scoring chance.

• A 40+ yard rushing touchdown extended Washington’s lead.

• A forced fumble eliminated a potential comeback drive.

Each play shifted win probability significantly.

Complete Team Statistics Comparison

Washington outperformed Los Angeles in total impact plays despite similar yardage totals.

• Washington: 389 total yards.

• Chargers: 336 total yards.

• Efficiency in red zone and turnover margin separated the teams.

Raw yardage was close, but situational execution was not.

Total Yards, Possession, and Efficiency

The Chargers controlled time of possession, but Washington was more efficient per drive.

• Chargers led in possession time.

• Washington averaged higher yards per play.

• Scoring efficiency favored Washington.

Efficiency metrics outweighed clock control.

Passing vs Rushing Breakdown

Washington maintained balanced offense, while the Chargers leaned on short passing.

• Washington: 226 passing yards, 163 rushing yards.

• Chargers: 181 passing yards, 155 rushing yards.

• Washington generated more explosive runs.

Balance allowed Washington to control defensive alignments.

Turnovers, Penalties, and Defensive Pressure

Turnover differential favored Washington.

• Chargers committed key turnovers.

• Washington recorded five sacks.

• Chargers defense produced limited quarterback pressure.

Defensive disruption directly influenced scoring drives.

Washington Commanders Player Stats

Washington’s core contributors delivered efficient, situational performance.

• Quarterback protected the ball.

• Running game generated over 100 yards from the lead back.

• Defense forced turnovers in critical zones.

Production aligned with strategic priorities.

Quarterback Performance Analysis

The quarterback completed 15 of 26 passes for 231 yards and one touchdown.

• Zero interceptions.

• Added rushing yards to extend drives.

• Strong third-down decision-making.

Ball security and mobility were key factors.

Leading Rushers and Ground Game Impact

The primary running back rushed for 111 yards and two touchdowns.

• Averaged strong yards per carry.

• Broke tackles in second level.

• Converted short-yardage situations.

The ground game controlled defensive spacing.

Top Receivers and Target Distribution

The leading receiver recorded eight catches for 96 yards and one touchdown.

• High catch efficiency.

• Majority of targets came on intermediate routes.

• Converted key third downs.

Distribution favored high-percentage throws.

Defensive Leaders and Game-Changing Plays

Defensive backs and edge rushers set the tone.

• One interception in the red zone.

• Five total sacks by defensive unit.

• Forced fumble stopped a scoring opportunity.

Execution in high-leverage moments defined the win.

Los Angeles Chargers Player Stats

The Chargers produced yardage but struggled in execution zones.

• Quarterback maintained solid completion rate.

• Rushing attack was moderate but not dominant.

• Defense lacked sustained pressure.

Situational inefficiency limited scoring output.

Quarterback Passing and Mobility Metrics

The quarterback completed 22 of 29 passes for 166 yards, one touchdown, and one interception.

• High completion percentage.

• Limited downfield attempts.

• Added rushing yards as primary ground contributor.

Yardage was steady but lacked explosive gains.

Running Back Contributions

Running backs combined for moderate yardage without breakaway runs.

• Short gains on early downs.

• Limited red zone effectiveness.

• Few chunk plays beyond 15 yards.

The rushing attack did not stretch the defense.

Receiving Leaders and Red Zone Targets

The top receiver logged five receptions for 58 yards.

• Targets focused on short and intermediate routes.

• Limited vertical threats.

• Minimal red zone conversions.

The passing tree remained compressed.

Defensive Standouts and Sack Leaders

The Chargers recorded one sack and limited turnovers.

• Edge rushers struggled against protection schemes.

• Secondary allowed sustained drives.

• Few negative plays generated.

Pressure rate was below season average.

Quarterback Comparison: Head-to-Head Performance

Washington’s quarterback was more efficient in high-impact situations.

• Higher yards per attempt.

• Zero turnovers.

• Better red zone execution.

Decision-making under pressure separated performance levels.

Completion Percentage and Passing Yards

Chargers quarterback had higher completion rate.

• 22/29 completions.

• Washington quarterback produced more total passing yards.

• Efficiency favored Washington per attempt.

Completion percentage alone did not dictate outcome.

Touchdowns, Interceptions, and QB Rating

Washington avoided interceptions while matching touchdown output.

• One touchdown each.

• Chargers threw one interception.

• Rating favored Washington due to turnover control.

Turnover margin influenced rating gap.

Pocket Presence and Rushing Contribution

Both quarterbacks used mobility to extend plays.

• Washington quarterback added critical scramble yards.

• Chargers quarterback led team in rushing.

• Pressure handling favored Washington.

Mobility supported offensive sustainability.

Offensive Strategy and Execution

Washington executed a balanced, situational strategy.

• Mixed run-pass concepts.

• Protected lead with controlled drives.

• Targeted defensive weaknesses.

Execution consistency made the difference.

Play Calling Tendencies

Washington leaned on balanced play calling.

• Early-down runs set up play action.

• Chargers relied on short passing.

• Limited deep attempts by Los Angeles.

Predictability affected defensive adjustments.

Third-Down and Red Zone Efficiency

Washington converted key third downs.

• Higher red zone touchdown rate.

• Chargers settled for limited scoring.

• Situational execution favored Washington.

Efficiency outweighed volume.

Explosive Plays and Scoring Drives

Washington generated more explosive gains.

• Long rushing touchdown.

• Multiple 20+ yard plays.

• Sustained drives over 8 plays.

Explosiveness shifted defensive alignment.

Defensive Performance and Impact Players

Washington’s defense created decisive momentum swings.

• Five sacks.

• Red zone interception.

• Forced fumble recovery.

High-pressure moments defined performance.

Sack Leaders and Pressure Rate

Washington recorded five sacks compared to one by Los Angeles.

• Edge rush pressure disrupted rhythm.

• Interior push collapsed pocket.

• Chargers struggled with pass protection adjustments.

Pressure rate influenced turnover risk.

Turnovers Forced and Takeaway Impact

Washington forced multiple turnovers.

• One interception at goal line.

• One forced fumble.

• Turnovers led to scoring drives.

Takeaways shifted game control.

Coverage Strength and Secondary Performance

Washington secondary limited deep completions.

• Tight coverage on perimeter routes.

• Minimal yards after catch allowed.

• Effective zone disguises.

Coverage integrity supported pass rush.

Special Teams Contributions

Special teams maintained scoring stability and field position balance.

• Accurate field goals.

• Clean extra point execution.

• Stable return coverage.

No critical errors occurred.

Field Goal and Extra Point Accuracy

Kicking unit converted scoring attempts without misses.

• Reliable short-range attempts.

• No blocked kicks.

• Consistent snap-to-hold timing.

Execution preserved momentum.

Punt and Kick Return Yards

Return units generated modest gains.

• Limited explosive returns.

• Fair catch strategy used when appropriate.

• Coverage units prevented long returns.

Field position remained controlled.

Hidden Yardage and Field Position Impact

Washington benefited from short-field drives after turnovers.

• Average starting field position improved in second half.

• Chargers began multiple drives inside own territory.

• Hidden yardage favored Washington overall.

Field position reinforced scoring advantage.

Key Player Highlights and Milestones

Individual achievements added narrative value to the matchup.

• 100+ yard rushing performance.

• Career reception milestone reached.

• Defensive breakthrough performance.

Milestones occurred despite competitive pressure.

Record-Breaking Performances

A Chargers receiver reached a historic career reception mark.

• Achieved milestone during regular-season play.

• Ranked among fastest in league history.

• Performance occurred in losing effort.

Individual success contrasted team outcome.

Career Milestones Achieved in the Game

Several players reached statistical benchmarks.

• Quarterback maintained turnover-free milestone.

• Running back achieved first multi-touchdown game of season.

• Defensive back secured season’s first interception.

Milestones influenced season tracking metrics.

Breakout or Unexpected Standout Players

A rookie running back delivered a breakout game.

• Over 100 rushing yards.

• Two touchdowns.

• High yards-after-contact rate.

Performance reshaped depth chart discussions.

Advanced Metrics and Analytical Insights

Efficiency analytics favor Washington’s overall impact.

• Higher expected points contribution.

• Better success rate per play.

• Superior defensive disruption index.

Advanced data supports final score outcome.

Player Efficiency Ratings

Washington quarterback posted higher efficiency score.

• Strong yards per attempt.

• Zero turnover penalty.

• Positive third-down rating.

Efficiency exceeded surface stats.

Expected Points Added (EPA)

EPA per play favored Washington.

• Defensive EPA swing after turnovers.

• Positive rushing EPA on explosive plays.

• Chargers negative EPA on interception drive.

Situational plays drove analytics gap.

Snap Counts and Usage Trends

Core offensive players logged majority of snaps.

• Lead running back handled primary workload.

• Defensive rotation maintained pressure intensity.

• Chargers rotated receivers frequently.

Usage patterns reflected strategic adjustments.

How This Game Impacts Season Standings

The win strengthened Washington’s position within its division.

• Improved conference record.

• Enhanced playoff probability.

• Maintained competitive momentum.

Loss placed Chargers under added divisional pressure.

Division Implications

Washington gained leverage in divisional ranking.

• Better head-to-head confidence.

• Strengthened tiebreaker scenarios.

• Positive record trend entering next matchup.

Division races tightened.

Playoff Positioning Outlook

Washington improved wildcard positioning metrics.

• Increased win probability projections.

• Enhanced strength-of-schedule outlook.

• Chargers faced reduced margin for error.

Standings impact extended beyond one game.

Momentum and Upcoming Matchups

Momentum shifted toward Washington entering next week.

• Defensive confidence elevated.

• Chargers required offensive recalibration.

• Coaching adjustments expected on both sides.

Short-term trajectory favored Washington.

FAQs

Who had the most passing yards in the Washington Commanders vs Chargers game?

The quarterback with the highest passing yards was Washington’s starter, recording 231 yards. Full details can be found in the Washington Commanders vs Chargers match player stats, including completions, attempts, and touchdowns.

Which player scored the most touchdowns in this matchup?

Washington’s lead running back scored two touchdowns, making him the top scorer for the game.

How did the defenses perform during the game?

Washington’s defense recorded five sacks and forced multiple turnovers, while the Chargers had one sack and one interception.

What were the total rushing yards for each team?

Washington gained 163 rushing yards, and the Chargers had 155 yards on the ground.

Where can I find the official box score for the game?

The official box score is available on NFL.com, team websites, and verified sports data platforms, showing full stats and player breakdowns.